The world since ISIS and then Trump, seems to have become more openly divisive. There are people on Facebook or other social media sites, who openly state that if their ‘friends’ voted for him they will be blocked, or if their friends didn’t vote for him, they will be blocked. I’ve not before seen such strong divisiveness before, or maybe I’ve had my eyes and ears shut.
Apart from supporting a state political party Dignity Disability in South Australia, I have also become a bit of a ‘political atheist’, feeling like most political parties and their leaders of parties are not really in it for us. It would seem, and could sound like I’ve just become too cynical, which is quite possibly true as well! That sense of otherness since being diagnosed with dementia, and the bullying that has been the reality of the experience of living beyond dementia, is, I am sure, based on ignorance and preconceptions. But it does not excuse it!
I follow Brain Pickings, and the email in my Inbox some time ago was the article I refer to today which is of particular relevance to what I’ve been watching the last few months and years, and also of my experience of Living Beyond Dementia.
Carl Sagan on Moving Beyond Us vs. Them, Bridging Conviction with Compassion, and Meeting Ignorance with Kindness
“In the course of looking deeply within ourselves, we may challenge notions that give comfort before the terrors of the world.”
By Maria Popova
“Unless we are very, very careful,” wrote psychologist-turned-artist Anne Truitt in contemplating compassion and the cure for our chronic self-righteousness, “we doom each other by holding onto images of one another based on preconceptions that are in turn based on indifference to what is other than ourselves.”
She urged for “the honoring of others in a way that grants them the grace of their own autonomy and allows mutual discovery.”
But how are we to find in ourselves the capacity — the willingness — to honor otherness where we see only ignorance and bigotry in beliefs not only diametrically opposed to our own but dangerous to the very fabric of society?
Further into the article…
“The greatest detriment to reason, Sagan argues, is that we let our reasonable and righteous convictions slip into self-righteousness, that deadly force of polarization:
The chief deficiency I see in the skeptical movement is in its polarization: Us vs. Them — the sense that we have a monopoly on the truth; that those other people who believe in all these stupid doctrines are morons; that if you’re sensible, you’ll listen to us; and if not, you’re beyond redemption. This is unconstructive… Whereas, a compassionate approach that from the beginning acknowledges the human roots of pseudoscience and superstition might be much more widely accepted. If we understand this, then of course we feel the uncertainty and pain of the abductees, or those who dare not leave home without consulting their horoscopes, or those who pin their hopes on crystals from Atlantis.”